Late last week,Chuck Klosterman wrote an interesting piece for ESPN's new off-shoot website Grantland.com about how DVRing a sporting event lessens the experience
. He's got a lot of great examples (some rational, some irrational) and I by and large agree with all of his points.
Except for how it pertains to soccer. As a married man with only one television set, I have to sacrifice a lot of "live" soccer. For instance, Sunday night is a very heavy TV night for us, so the NBA Finals and Sporting Kansas City games both were relegated to "record" status.
Sign Up and Save
Get six months of free digital access to The Kansas City Star
The NBA Finals I found hard to rewatch last night. I think the zipping through the commercials made the event feel less important in some way -- I fast-forwarded most of the second and third quarters because of this, stopping only for obvious highlights.
When it came to the Sporting game, it was a far different scenario. Now, obviously, I'm fairly invested in the outcome of the Sporting game. But, more than that, I found it a rather serene experience.**This is when I mention that I still have an unwatched DVR of the USA-Panama game sitting in my queue.
It didn't feel "less" important at all.
Without the commercial breaks and without having Twitter opened, I felt personally invested and immersed in the game. More so than any game but the Thursday night Livestrong Park opener.
Obviously, the result probably factored in a bit. Not sure if there would've been magic time-shifting the Toronto game.
Interested to see what your thoughts on time-shifting sporting or Sporting events? Do you time-shift the game? Does it make it seem less important? Does it not matter?