A reader had an interesting question on a story that ran on Page A-1 about Missouri’s gun death rate, which has now overtaken traffic fatalities as the leading nonmedical cause of death in the state.
He pointing specifically to this sentence: “This year, of the 54 traffic fatalities the Highway Patrol had handled as of Sunday, 71 percent of victims had not been belted.”
“Why would the reporter give a percent instead of the actual number?” he asked. “71 percent is actually 38 and 1/3 people.”
He suggested in this case, knowing the numbers would have been preferable. But in other statistics, such as utility rates, for example, percentages may tell the story better.
Digital Access For Only $0.99
For the most comprehensive local coverage, subscribe today.
Is there a standard answer to this question? Not that I know of. However, I spoke to reporter Brian Burnes, who told me percentages are what he usually uses when writing about rates. And I have to say that since this particular story is about how fatality rates have varied over time, I find it more informative than the actual numbers myself.
But this is definitely a case where subjectivity rules. It’s perfectly fair to disagree with the story’s choices.