Don’t expect any police department to institute significant reforms on its own even after a tragic shooting that took the life of unarmed, 18-year-old Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo.
The African American’s teen’s shooting death on Aug. 9 by white police Officer Darren Wilson has led to the creation of the Don’t Shoot Coalition. It is a nonpartisan group of about 50 organizations that takes it’s name from the often repeated message from weeks of protests after Brown’s death — “Hands Up; Don’t Shoot!”
The coalition has met with the Department of Justice in its civil rights investigations into Brown’s death and a second investigation of the Ferguson Police Department. A state grand jury also is examining the case to determine whether charges will be filed.
The coalition on Wednesday submitted an extensive list of recommendations to the Justice Department as ways to improve the “abysmal state of policing in North St. Louis County.”
It is a great list, and law enforcement departments throughout the country should consider implementing the recommendations to better serve the diverse and growing population of the United States. No doubt there will be push-back from some police forces because the recommendations challenge the way things have always been.
But it is good that the Don’t Shoot Coalition has made the recommendations public so they can be openly discussed and another shooting of someone like Brown can be prevented. The reforms are:
▪ Body cameras on all officers with policies as articulated by Drone Free St. Louis.
▪ Signed form, translated into languages for immigrant communities, or video for all consent searches.
▪ Requirement that each department reflects the diversity of the community it serves and support to help them do so.
▪ Solid enforcement of racial profiling protections, including use of racial profiling statistics in performance reviews.
▪ An end to departmental policies that measure officer’s performance predominantly by number of stops or arrests or provide incentives for stops and arrests, replaced by measures of performance rooted in community policing.
▪ Requirement that police provide “receipts” after any police encounter that include the reason for the stop, and the officer’s name and badge number.
▪ Requirement that officers carry palm cards with instructions on how to file an Internal Affairs complaint to provide to any citizen who requests it, with the officer name and badge number included.
▪ Setting of law enforcement priorities by community members or community advisory boards.
▪ Name-redacted public access to all discipline notices in officer files.
▪ Release of detailed annual internal affairs complaint and resolution statistics, including a name-redacted list of how many complaints the officers with the highest numbers of complaints each year receive.
▪ Early Intervention Systems for officer performance and conduct with oversight to guarantee appropriate responses to red flags.
▪ All policies stated above to apply to county law enforcement agencies.
▪ Countywide Civilian Oversight Board designed for inclusion of all St. Louis County departments and embodying the principles of independence, representation of all stakeholders, access to all evidence and the ability to make policy recommendations as well as discipline and training recommendations in response to individual incidents.
▪ Consolidation of Departments.
▪ Truth and Reconciliation Commission dealing with victims and perpetrators of police brutality.
▪ The creation of standards, “best practices” and/or federal mandates that can be leveraged to pass the following state legislation or regulations.
▪ Mandatory training requirements for all officers on issues such as cultural sensitivity, interacting with mentally ill, responding to sexual assault, domestic violence, officer misconduct and integrity, use of force, effective communication and de-escalation skills and other topics in which Missouri police do not receive adequate training. Dialogue with affected communities should be part of all training;
▪ Programs whereby trained advocates for special-needs groups give feedback on policies and respond to calls with officers.
▪ Requirement that individual officers carry insurance for misconduct.
▪ Collection of detailed and accurate racial profiling data that includes pedestrian stops, a cause of action and provides both “carrots” and “sticks” to incentivize improvement.
▪ Strengthening the financing and budget of Police Officer Standards and Training, including investigation of serious citizen complaints, setting statewide policy on police practices, and enforcing strong training mandates.
▪ The ability of the Police Officer Standards and Training Commission to decertify whole departments and strengthening of officer decertification policies.
▪ Establishment of a discipline matrix to ensure consistency in how supervisors respond to misconduct.
▪ Uniform and updated Use of Force policies.
▪ Whistleblower protection for officers and confidential informants.
▪ Uniform protocols outlining a clear process for response to any officer-involved situation wherein deadly force is used, including collection of facts, established timeline for release of information, and public announcements.
▪ Mandated Force Investigative Units with professional standards for every municipality or county and review by independent state authorities in all use-of-deadly-force incidents;
▪ Mandated release of the name of police officers involved in incidents wherein deadly force was used within 48 hours of the incident.
▪ Required annual report on the use of deadly force by all Missouri Police Departments.
▪ Mandated use of an assessment tool gauging racial bias in all Missouri police forces that goes beyond the recording of racial composition of police stops.
▪ Automatic removal of local, state and national funding for any police department that demonstrates racial bias according to the aforementioned assessment tool.
▪ Statewide guidance on the creation of civilian oversight boards based on the principles given above.
▪ Ongoing leadership training for a diverse selection of qualified officers who will benefit from training on best police practices and general principles of leadership to help shape the next generation of law enforcement leaders.
▪ A publicly available national database of police shootings, excessive force and deaths in custody, broken down by race and other demographic data, with key privacy protections, including the exclusion of personally identifying factors and information.
▪ Interstate coordination of Police Officer Standards and Training data regarding best practices for training and decertification information.
▪ Divestment of federal anti-drug grants and all other federal funding for police departments that demonstrate abuse of power and use of racial profiling as demonstrated by disparities in stops and arrests and massive reinvestment in community controlled and based policing practices.
▪ Support for the passage of the End Racial Profiling Act (ERPA).
▪ National use of force policy and a mandate that state and local police adopt it.
▪ Strict limits on asset seizure and the transfer of any military equipment to local law enforcement under 1033 and other programs, guidelines that ensure that the equipment is not used against non-violent protesters and an end to the requirement that such military weaponry is used within a year.
▪ End of the Byrne Program that incentivizes arrests.
Policing would change to better serve communities if these recommendations are adopted.