In blunt testimony revealed Tuesday, former managers of Trump University, the for-profit school started by Donald Trump, portray it as an unscrupulous business that relied on high-pressure sales tactics, employed unqualified instructors, made deceptive claims and exploited vulnerable students willing to pay tens of thousands for Trump’s insights.
One sales manager for Trump University, Ronald Schnackenberg, recounted how he was reprimanded for not pushing a financially struggling couple hard enough to sign up for a $35,000 real estate class despite his conclusion that it would endanger their economic future. He watched with disgust, he said, as a fellow Trump University salesman persuaded the couple to purchase the class anyway.
“I believe that Trump University was a fraudulent scheme,” Schnackenberg wrote in his testimony, “and that it preyed upon the elderly and uneducated to separate them from their money.”
For Trump, whose presidential campaign hinges on his reputation as a businessman, the newly unsealed documents offer an unflattering snapshot of his career since branching out, over the past decade, from building skyscrapers into endeavors that cashed in on his name to sell everything from water and steaks to ties and education.
Sign Up and Save
Get six months of free digital access to The Kansas City Star
The release of the documents Tuesday, under court order, was the latest turn in a federal lawsuit, filed in California by dissatisfied former Trump University students, that has bedeviled the businessman since 2010 and could trail him into the White House if he is elected president.
Trump, who started the university in 2005, owned 93 percent of the now-defunct company. From the start, he acted as its chief promoter, rather than day-to-day manager, selling it as a tool of financial empowerment that would improve life for thousands of ordinary Americans.
The most striking documents were written testimony from former employees of Trump University who said they had become disenchanted with the university’s tactics and culture. Corrine Sommer, an event manager, recounted how colleagues encouraged students to open up as many credit cards as possible to pay for classes that many of them could not afford.
“It’s OK, just max out your credit card,” Sommer recalled their saying.
Jason Nicholas, a sales executive at Trump University, recalled a pitch used to lure students — that Trump would be “actively involved” in their education. “This was not true,” Nicholas testified, saying Trump was hardly involved at all.
Trump University, Nicholas concluded, was “a facade, a total lie.”
Lawyers for Trump on Tuesday challenged those characterizations, saying that the testimony of the former Trump University employees “was completely discredited” in depositions taken for the California lawsuit. Lawyers for Trump declined to release those depositions.
As he has in the past, Trump argued through representatives that the complaints emanated from a small number of former students and that the vast majority had offered positive reviews of their experience.
“Trump University looks forward to using this evidence, along with much more, to win when the case is brought before a jury,” said Hope Hicks, a spokeswoman for Trump.
The court records show the role that Trump — and his outsize reputation — played in trying to sell the real estate classes to thousands of students. Marketing materials bearing his signature encouraged prospective students to take advantage of a downturn in the housing market to earn quick profits.
He offered the kind of assurances that financial advisers have long cautioned consumers to be wary of. “How would you like to market-proof your financial future,” Trump asked in one brochure.
Trump started the for-profit Trump University just as the overheated U.S. housing market neared its peak, promising that its classes would impart his wisdom about real estate and moneymaking to the general public.
But dozens of complaints about the school rolled into the offices of attorneys general in Florida, Texas, New York and Illinois, officials said, prompting multiple investigations and, eventually, the lawsuit from former students in California.
Of course, Trump and the promise of his engagement with the school was the biggest draw of all. In the documents released Tuesday, instructors described themselves as “hand-selected” by Trump. But in a deposition related to the lawsuit, Trump acknowledged that he did not pick the instructors.
Not all the documents made public Tuesday were critical. Many former students said the classes delivered exactly what they had expected.
“Trump University definitely made me more prepared to tackle the ‘real world' of real estate investing,” wrote David Wright Jr., who signed up for a six-month program. “We really learned a lot of from Trump University and have found a modicum of success,” wrote another student, Kissy Gordon.
Former employees like Sommer took a dimmer view of the school. In her testimony, she said she was startled by the qualifications of some Trump University instructors.
Sommer recalled that a member of the Trump University sales team, who had previously sold jewelry, was promoted to become an instructor. He had “no real estate experience,” she said.
She added that many of the instructors had the quality that the school seemed to value most: “They were skilled at high-pressure sales,” she said.