- HOME
- NEWS
- SPORTS
- BUSINESS
- FYI/LIVING
- ENTERTAINMENT
- OPINION
- JOBS
- CARS
- REAL ESTATE
- RENTALS
- CLASSIFIEDS
- SHOPPING
- EXTRAS
'); } -->
“As much as we’ve tried to improve our offense over the last couple of years, I think we’ve done the best we can do at this point in time,” Moore said. “I don’t know what else we’re going to be able to do this winter.”
Payroll is the primary problem.
The Royals’ projected $60 million budget already has $41.4 million committed to nine players. Club officials now expect Jacobs to cost $3 million or more after briefings this week from MLB officials on the anticipated state of the market.
Those same projections suggest it will cost at least $12 million to retain Zack Greinke, Mark Teahen, John Buck and John Bale. All four are eligible for arbitration, and all but Greinke already make at least $2.2 million.
The Royals have 10 other players poised for arbitration, including Brian Bannister and Kyle Davies. Both are first-time eligibles in line for hefty increases after making close to the big-league minimum in 2008.
The tight budget appears to rule out any major foray into the free-agent market.
“I don’t think so,” Moore admitted. “We’d have to do something (to make a major signing).”
Trades remain a possibility, of course, and rumors continue to link the Royals to possible deals for outfielder Jeff Francouer of Atlanta and shortstop Yuniesky Betancourt of Seattle.
Those two deals would address the Royals’ primary needs, but indications are that no serious discussions have taken place. The major knock on Francouer and Betancourt is their poor on-base percentage.
The same criticism has been aimed at Jacobs, but Moore rejected any suggestion that the trade for him represented a reversal from his tenet that the Royals become more committed to improving on-base percentage after finishing 26th among the 30 teams.
“Don’t get confused when we bring a player in, and he doesn’t fit the mold,” he said. “We can only take advantage of those players who are available.
“Should we do nothing because (Jacobs’) on-base percentage is not what we want? Should we do nothing even though our coaches think they can help this guy improve and when we know this guy is a hard worker?”
Moore thinks that Jacobs’ power outweighs other negatives. The Royals’ 120 homers last season topped only Minnesota among American League teams. Jacobs hit 32 for Florida — more than any Royals player since Jermaine Dye hit 33 in 2000.
“Mike Jacobs has the kind of raw power you can’t develop, and that we can’t afford in the free-agent market,” Moore said. “So when you get a chance to acquire someone like that, you do it. I think it makes our team better.”
What comes next? Even Moore isn’t sure.
“It’s the same thing all of the time, but it’s the truth: We’ll continue to look for ways to improve our baseball team,” he said. “We’re going to be open-minded with different scenarios.
“I expect us to improve our team, potentially, through trades vs. the free-agent market, but we’ll look for opportunities with free agents. We need to continue to improve.”
Front-office possibility?
Speculation points to the Royals as a possible landing place for former Phillies assistant general manager Mike Arbuckle, who left the club this week when passed over for promotion after general manager Pat Gillick retired.
To reach Bob Dutton, Royals reporter for The Star, call 816-234-4352 or send e-mail to bdutton@kcstar.com
@Nyx.CommentBody@