Conner Frankamp’s three-point shooting gives KU a chance at end

03/23/2014 7:48 PM

03/23/2014 7:48 PM

It was the type of shot Conner Frankamp dreamed about as a child.

Kansas trailed Stanford by three in the closing seconds of its NCAA Tournament game Sunday at the Scottrade Center, and the Jayhawks needed someone to send it to overtime. So they put their Sweet 16 hopes on his shoulders.

Frankamp, a freshman guard from Wichita North, fought free on the perimeter, did his best to get an open look on the right side of the key but his shot missed hard to the right. No. 10 seed Stanford held on for the 60-57 upset victory.

“I knew it was off when it left my hand,” Frankamp said later. “It wasn’t a great look. But the next time I get an opportunity like that I will be able to knock it down.”

That confidence is one of the few silver linings that came out of an otherwise depressing loss for the Jayhawks, the No. 2 seed in the South Region.

Frankamp turned into a go-to scorer by the end of the weekend. He scored 12 points on four of seven three-point shooting, including a buzzer-beater that gave Kansas a halftime lead and two more that kept its comeback hopes alive in the final 25 seconds.

“He played fantastic,” KU sophomore forward Perry Ellis said. “That is just going to be great for him moving forward and for the team. He definitely gained a lot of confidence, and we all gained confidence in him. That is going to be great. He played really well.”

Frankamp said the experience he gained in St. Louis, scoring 22 points in 43 minutes over two games — will likely serve him well when he returns for his sophomore season.

His teammates agreed with that assessment.

“He gave us a big lift,” KU guard Frank Mason said. “He is only going to get better.”

Still, Frankamp was in no mood to elaborate on his future after this crushing defeat.

“Maybe I will have a little bit more confidence in myself, but this is all about the team,” Frankamp said. “It hurts bad to be a part of the team that just lost.”

Kansas missed 39 of 58 shots and looked lost against Stanford’s zone defense.

That could have been overcome with one more three-pointer. Instead, Kansas failed to advance past the opening weekend of the NCAA Tournament for the first time since 2010.

In the aftermath, it was difficult for Frankamp to grade his debut college season.

“Not as good as I wanted it to be, because we got knocked out early,” Frankamp said. “Hopefully we can prepare and try to get here again next year.”

He will benefit from this weekend if they do.

“I was more confident and my team had confidence in me this week,” Frankamp said. “Coach Self did, as well. I just tried to do as much as I could to help the team while I was out there.”

Frankamp figures to be a valuable member of the Jayhawks’ returning core group. Though his overall numbers were low as a freshman — 2.1 points and 0.5 rebounds in 8 minutes — he showed promise as the season progressed.

He played in 11 of the Jayhawks’ final 12 games, and served as a valuable bench option in the NCAA Tournament, playing a career-high 25 minutes in KU’s opening win over Eastern Kentucky on Friday.

Reporters went so far as to question why Self didn’t play Frankamp more on Sunday.

“We had to get inside their defense and they’re big,” Self said. “When you play Conner and play with another guard, that puts him guarding a 6-7 guy and they exploited that a little bit.”

Frankamp has always been one of the best shooters on the roster. If he can improve as a defender next year, his playing time could spike.

He showed his potential in St. Louis.

“That can happen for Conner, definitely,” Ellis said. “He found his game and started playing great late in the season. He can build off this.”

Videos

Join the discussion

is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service