Clean Water Act benefits Missouri, Kansas

03/28/2014 3:57 PM

03/28/2014 3:57 PM

Protecting Midwestern streams and wetlands under the Clean Water Act helps our communities and is vital to our health, safety and quality of life.

Local rivers — the Missouri, Kansas, Platte, Blue and Little Blue — along with their network of tributaries and wetlands, like Shoal, Stranger, Mill, Cedar, and Indian Creeks, are important to the Kansas City area's water quality, recreation, wildlife habitat and flood abatement. For the past 15 years, two complex court decisions muddled the law, and we lost a clear understanding of which waters are protected, and which aren’t.

Working jointly with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, we’re releasing a proposed rule that clarifies which waters are protected by the law. Our proposal will smooth out wrinkles in the existing law; it does not add to or expand the scope of waters historically protected under the Clean Water Act.

The proposed rule does not change exemptions and exclusions for agriculture. We’ve worked closely with the agricultural community to avoid any surprises.

The rule will not protect any new types of waters that haven’t historically been covered, and it will not regulate groundwater or tile drainage systems or increase regulation of ditches whether they are irrigation or drainage. The EPA has worked arm in arm with the U.S. Department of Agriculture to make sure we’re addressing farmers’ concerns up front.

Farmers and ranchers benefit when healthy wetlands and small streams are able to store floodwaters so that crops and pastures are not damaged or destroyed during floods. They also need reliable water sources and available irrigation water to grow the crops that feed our nation.

From the Missouri River to the Kaw, the American waterscape is a defining part of our national identity. In the Midwest, we are blessed with a vast network of wetlands and streams that support these rivers: from swamps in the Missouri Bootheel to the Cheyenne Bottoms in Kansas; from oxbow lakes in Missouri to Lake of the Ozarks; from small seasonal streams to the Mississippi River.

Because of this diversity of water resources, previous interpretations of waters of the U.S. resulted in uncertainty. Clarifying Clean Water Act protections will add certainty and clarity for farmers, developers and others.

People depend on streams, lakes and rivers for swimming, boating, wildlife and drinking water. According to a 2011 survey by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 90.1 million Americans, or 38 percent of the U.S. population 16 years and older, fished, hunted or enjoyed wildlife-associated recreation.

Hunters, anglers and wildlife recreationists spent $145 billion. Fishing attracted 33 million individuals 16 years and older.

The proposed rule helps clear the way for the Clean Water Act to do its job and ensure clean, healthy waters. The proposed rule will be open for public comment for 90 days from publication in the Federal Register.

Visit http://water.epa.gov/CWAwaters to learn more about our proposal and the Clean Water Act. We’re committed to continuing to listen to everyone who has a stake in this. So I urge you to voice your concerns and lend us your advice.

That’s how we’ll get the final rule right.

Videos

Join the discussion

is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service