It’s often assumed that people are paid what they’re worth. According to this logic, minimum wage workers aren’t worth more than $7.25 an hour. If they were worth more, they’d earn more. Any attempt to force employers to pay them more will only kill jobs.
By this same logic, CEOs of big companies are worth their giant compensation packages, now averaging about 300 times the pay of the typical American worker. They must be worth it or they wouldn’t be paid this much. Any attempt to limit their pay is fruitless because their pay will only take some other form.
“Paid what you’re worth” is a dangerous myth.
Fifty years ago, when General Motors was the largest employer in America, the typical GM worker got paid $35 an hour in today’s dollars. Today, America’s largest employer is Walmart, and the typical Walmart worker earns $8.80 an hour.
Does this mean the typical GM employee a half-century ago was worth four times what today’s typical Walmart employee is worth? No.
The real difference is that the GM worker a half-century ago had a strong union behind him that summoned the collective bargaining power of all autoworkers to get a substantial share of company revenues for its members. Today’s Walmart workers don’t have a union to negotiate a better deal. They’re on their own.
Today’s CEOs rake in 300 times the pay of average workers not because they’re “worth” it but because they appoint the compensation committees on their boards that decide executive pay.
Or consider that bonuses on Wall Street were up 15 percent in 2013 over the year before, totaling a whopping $26.7 billion.
Are Wall Street bankers really worth it? Not if you figure in the hidden subsidy flowing to the big Wall Street banks that ever since the bailout of 2008 have been considered too big to fail.
People who park their savings in these banks accept a lower interest rate on deposits than they require from America’s smaller banks, because smaller banks are riskier places to park money.
This hidden subsidy gives Wall Street banks a competitive advantage over the smaller banks, which means Wall Street makes more money.
According to researchers, this hidden subsidy is about eight-tenths of a percentage point. Multiply that by the total amount of money parked in the 10 biggest Wall Street banks and you get roughly $83 billion a year, about three times what Wall Street paid out in bonuses last year.
Get it? Wall Street bankers got fat paychecks plus bonuses last year not because they’re “worth” it but because big Wall Street banks hold a privileged place in the American political economy. Why hasn’t Congress used the antitrust laws to cut them down to size so they’re not too big to fail, or at least taxed away their hidden subsidy (which, after all, results from their taxpayer-financed bailout)?
Perhaps because Wall Street also accounts for a large proportion of campaign donations to major candidates for Congress and the presidency of both parties.
America’s low-wage workers don’t have privileged positions. They can’t afford to make major campaign contributions, and they have no political clout.
They don’t get hidden subsidies. They can’t even get a minimum-wage increase.
The $26.7 billion of bonuses Wall Street banks paid out last year would be enough to more than double the pay of every one of America’s 1,085,000 full-time minimum-wage workers.
The “paid what you’re worth” argument is fundamentally misleading because it ignores power, overlooks institutions and disregards politics. It lures the unsuspecting into thinking that nothing whatsoever should be done to change what people are paid, because nothing can be done.
Don’t buy it.