So I Wasn’t Perfect in 2013; 2014 is looking just fine
12/30/2013 2:59 PM
01/01/2014 5:36 PM
This time last year, I made about two dozen predictions for 2013.
Some of them came true: Both Republican Chris Christie and Democrat Terry McAuliffe won their elections for governor, in New Jersey and Virginia respectively. The U.S. Supreme Court managed to decide two cases about same-sex marriage without either affirming or denying that the Constitution requires governments to recognize it. Obamacare’s health-insurance exchanges weren’t open for business on Oct. 1.
Others didn’t pan out. The Assad regime did not fall in Syria. Kate Middleton did not have twins, sparing the World Wide Web from a crash. I thought Paul Ryan would find that staying in the House was incompatible with running for president and assumed he would pick the latter. He seems to have made the opposite choice.
I waited until 14 weeks into President Barack Obama’s second term before announcing that it was starting to look like a failure. At year’s end, the point I made has become the conventional wisdom. Obama’s fifth year may not have hit as low a point as Abraham Lincoln’s did, but it has gone badly enough.
On the other hand, Republicans haven’t handed Obama major defeats either. It was Democrats, not Republicans, who killed the idea of restoring Bill Clinton’s assault-weapons ban.
A theme of this column during 2013 has been that Republicans should not obsess about beating Obama in climactic showdowns but rather do the more patient work of building a post-Obama conservatism. In July and again in August, I warned Republicans specifically that there was no way they could win a fight over a government shutdown, even in a cause as worthy as ending Obamacare. I didn’t persuade enough Republicans: The government shut down, Obamacare survived, and the Republicans sustained some political damage in return for nothing.
Another group of people I didn’t persuade this year were the justices of the Supreme Court. In June, I wrote that they should disappoint liberals and libertarians by letting the Defense of Marriage Act stand, and disappoint conservatives and libertarians by letting the Voting Rights Act stand. Instead they struck down provisions of each law, moved less by the Constitution than a sense that the laws were outdated.
The column didn’t traffic only in criticism. In September, I applauded the Republican Study Committee — a large group of conservatives in the U.S. House — for advancing conservative legislation to replace Obamacare. I made the case that our tax system is structured in a way that unfairly burdens parents. Republican Sen. Mike Lee of Utah agreed, proposing a remedy to the problem a few weeks later.
Every week, readers offered their reactions via email. Some of their comments were thoughtful and informative. Others asked good questions. Still others were unprintable. My one piece of advice for readers who don’t like my columns: Using swear words about me in the first paragraph of a long missive is a pretty good strategy for making sure that the rest of it goes unread.
I’m keeping my predictions for next year to a minimum. At the end of September, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said that success for Obamacare would mean “at least 7 million people” had signed up by March 2014. By her standard, Obamacare will be a failure. Other supporters of the law will define success downward. At least two Southern Democratic senators will lose their seats, thanks in large part to the health law. Wendy Davis will lose the race to be the next governor of Texas. Mayor Bill de Blasio’s effect on inequality in New York City will be undetectable. And by this time next year, we will all be thoroughly sick of meaningless polls about the 2016 presidential race.
In the meantime: Thanks for reading me in 2013, and may 2014 fill your life with blessings.
Join the Discussion
The Kansas City Star is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.