Public Editor

Readers' thoughts about The Star and

When to name juvenile suspects

04/29/2014 3:53 PM

04/29/2014 7:01 PM

An emailer brought up a great question about an Associated Press story that ran on earlier this week

. It concerned a Connecticut teenager who was stabbed to death at her school on the day of her prom.

At the time of this story, the case was still in the juvenile court system, and the suspect’s name had not been released by authorities. But the Associated Press identified him as Chris Plaskon, based on people who had seen him taken into custody.

Today, he has been charged as an adult, and the AP’s ID was correct.

“Should The Star report names of juvenile suspects, even if obtained from public sources (Facebook, etc.), before they are charged as an adult -- for states that do not release names of juveniles?” asked my emailer. It’s a fair question.

In Kansas, laws would dictate that the name of a 16-year-old accused of this crime would be released. In Missouri, it would not.

You of course can’t answer a “what if” with certainty, but if journalists were absolutely sure that the identification of the suspect were accurate, I don’t think it would be necessarily problematic for The Star to name a 16-year-old even if the state didn’t release the identity. After all, murder is the most serious crime one can be accused of, and a 16-year-old is vastly different from a 9-year-old, for example.

Join the Discussion

The Kansas City Star is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service