Why no photo on story?

12/04/2013 6:04 PM

12/04/2013 6:04 PM

One of the most-shared stories this week on most media sources around town is running with a photograph of one of the people involved, but that image has not appeared on KansasCity.com or in the print edition of The Kansas City Star. A caller today asked why.

The Star’s policy is not to use photographs taken from social media or other Internet sources without the permission of the person or his or her family. That appears to be where other media have gotten this specific shot.

Is that policy over-cautious? You could argue that. But I think there’s a strong journalistic defense to it as well.

What about when The Star uses police booking shots? And especially what about when one of those shots is used to identify a person who is later the victim of a homicide? I have spoken to multiple family members through the years who have objected to The Star’s use of these images, which are public documents. Their concerns there are perfectly understandable.

Videos

Join the discussion

is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service