Readers' thoughts about The Star and KansasCity.com
Is ‘Obamacare’ a dirty word?
09/19/2013 3:21 PM
09/21/2013 6:58 PM
also known as the Affordable Care Act.
But the system is probably known best of all as “Obamacare.”
Is that the right word to use? It’s certainly become ubiquitous in media coverage. In fact, it appeared in a headline on The Kansas City Star’s front page Monday of this week.
Other references have been phrased in ways such as “the ACA, often called Obamacare,” or by placing it in quotes.
There is no question that the term was originally devised by opponents to the legislation when it was still in its planning stages. But asThe New York Times noted last year
, the Obama administration has openly embraced it.
In fact, it’s used in the headlines ofofficial White House blog posts.
I just had a discussion with several editors in the newsroom about the term, which still somehow catches me up every time I read it — most likely because my brain still thinks back to when it was used purely as a pejorative.
But since the administration has clearly taken the word back, should journalists feel free to use it? Tough call.
Do non-wonk types know what “the ACA” means? And while “Obamacare” isn’t easy to fit into a headline, “The Affordable Care Act” is even harder.
My personal preference would be for one of the most-often used constructions in The Star’s news coverage: “the ACA, also known as Obamacare.” But try cramming that into a headline, especially in a single column on the printed page.
Join the Discussion
The Kansas City Star is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.