Stop-and-frisk policy in New York unconstitutional, judge rules

08/13/2013 1:09 PM

08/13/2013 6:28 PM

A federal judge was right to deem New York City’s stop-and-frisk policy unconstitutional and to appoint a federal monitor to oversee the program.

The policy unfairly singles out black and Hispanic men. Judge Shira Scheindlin said police have been making “unconstitutional stops and conducting unconstitutional frisks” based on race, the New York Daily News reports.

Police made 4.4 million stops between 2004 and 2012, and frisked more than 2 million people. “In 98.5 percent of the 2.3 million frisks, no weapon was found,” the judge wrote.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg opposes the judge’s ruling, saying the program has saved lives.

But the judge’s action tracks well with U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder’s plan to stop charging low-level nonviolent drug offenders with crimes that result in harsh mandatory sentences. The current system disproportionately hurts people of color, resulting in more incarceration and longer sentences.

Reducing needless incarceration appears to be the goal in New York and nationally.

Damon Daniel, Kansas City area regional organizing director of Communities Creating Opportunity, in a prepared release applauded Holder’s announcement.

“A nation and a state that invests more in punishment than opportunity has lost touch with its moral calling,” Daniel said. “Our current system of mass criminalization and mass incarceration is tearing our community apart. Spending millions to lock people away from families while cutting funding for programs that protect them from desperation is backward and cruel — it does nothing to break the cycle and only increases misery in Kansas City.

“(Holder’s) decision makes economic sense and is the moral direction to go.”

Videos

Join the Discussion

The Kansas City Star is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service