Jenkins, Huelskamp spar over biolab funding
12/16/2013 4:15 PM
12/16/2013 4:24 PM
Two members of Congress from Kansas are squabbling over the House-passed budget bill, and what it means for the National Bio- and Agro-Defense Facility, known as NBAF.
As usual, both members are shading reality a bit.
Last week Rep.Lynn Jenkins said she voted for the Paul Ryan
budget compromise because it included $404 million for the federal share of the lab, now under construction in Manhattan.
Nonsense, said Rep.Tim Huelskamp
, who voted against the deal. The budget agreement contains no spending for NBAF.
It’s true the budget deal contains no direct spending for NBAF. That’s left up to House and Senate appropriators, who still haven’t passed the Homeland Security spending bill for this year.
But the NBAF spending this year depends on passage of the Ryan budget, or something like it.Without a budget agreement, experts say
, Congress will simply pass a continuing resolution at old sequester levels. If that happens, NBAF funding this year would likely be impossible.
The House spending bill for Homeland Security contains NBAF spending. The Senate hasn’t voted on a bill yet, and there is no conference committee yet in place.
So the Ryan budget deal doesn’t fund NBAF, but killing it would almost certainly have the effect of de-funding the project this year.
Also unanswered: why deficit super-hawk Huelskamp supports the $404 million for NBAF in the first place.
Join the Discussion
The Kansas City Star is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.