The facts, faces and hum of local politics with Steve Kraske and Dave Helling
NYT story throws last-minute wrinkle into tax cut override politics
09/10/2013 9:41 AM
09/10/2013 9:46 AM
, which may go before the General Assembly tomorrow.
Will the 11th hour story have an impact on the override debate?
Nixon’s summer campaign against the tax cut measure has been successful, in part, on themerits
— that is, he’s at least argued to a stalemate with tax cut supporters over the actual wisdom of the bill. As has been the case for much of his time in office, Nixon has been able to avoid framing the dispute as a Republican-vs.-Democrat political issue.
But a front-page NYT story can send a message, which is this: Here’s a Democrat who’s figured out a way to win in a red state. It’s the kind of story Democrats in other parts of the nation might take into consideration as the 2016 presidential contest approaches.
A Nixon victory on the tax cut bill, in short, may help make him more of a national figure in his party.
Missouri Republicans will be upset if they lose the override vote. But national Republicans will bequite
upset if a Nixon tax cut victory elevates him in the 2016 discussion.
So the NYT story, on the eve of the override, could raise the stakes for the GOP. That, in turn, could increase pressure on recalcitrant Missouri Republican legislators to deny Nixon what could now be seen as a national victory.
The House GOP probably lacks the votes for an override (andSpeaker Tim Jones’ problems won’t help), but if you asked Nixon privately he might tell you it would have been better for the NYT story to run the day after
the veto session, not the day before.
Join the Discussion
The Kansas City Star is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.