Experts: KU prof's anti-NRA tweet raises legal questions

09/23/2013 2:45 PM

09/23/2013 2:45 PM

A University of Kansas professor's case involving a divisive Twitter comment has raised a host of new legal questions about how far employers can go in holding workers accountable for what they say on social media, according to experts in employment law.

The university announced Friday it was placing journalism professor David Guth on administrative leave for a comment he posted after a mass shooting earlier in the week at the Navy Yard in Washington, The Lawrence Journal-World reported.

David Guth told The Associated Press in an email Saturday that he agrees with the university that the safety of students is the top priority and he agreed to begin a planned sabbatical early amid the firestorm over his Twitter comment about the mass shootings at the Navy Yard in Washington.

His tweet read: "The blood is on the hands of the #NRA. Next time, let it be YOUR sons and daughters. Shame on you. May God damn you."

Mike Selmi, who teaches employment law at George Washington University in Washington, D.C., said the substance of what Guth said matters more than the fact it was made on social media.

While the university has a policy governing political expressions by faculty and unclassified staff, the issue may not be as simple as that — especially regarding public employees who usually enjoy stronger First Amendment protection than private-sector employees.

"It's a complicated area, and the law is evolving somewhat," he said. "Generally under the current law, if the public employee is speaking as part of their official duties, then their speech is not protected. If it's outside of his official duties, then there is a level of protection the Supreme Court has found, and you basically balance the individual's right to speak out on matters of public importance ... against the effect it has on the employer, including the workplace."

Gary Brunk, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Kansas and Western Missouri, said he didn't like Guth's comment, but he strongly believes it is protected speech.

"I think what the university has done is appalling," Brunk said. "It's one thing to do something that's a clear threat to another person, but he just expressed an opinion."

Donna Whiteman, general counsel for the Kansas Association of School Boards, said public employers have the right to police the behavior of their faculty, but courts would probably set a different standard for K-12 and higher education faculty.

"The legal standard is yes, employees have free speech rights, but they also are working in an environment where they are considered to be working with students," Whiteman said. "It's a little different in K-12 than college level. It's going to be judged on a case-by-case."

Guth told The Associated Press in an email Saturday that he agrees with the university that the safety of students is the top priority.

Guth say says he and others have received thousands of angry tweets, phone calls and emails. He says some contained thinly veiled death threats.

The university announced Friday it was placing the journalism professor on indefinite administrative leave. Its spokesman confirmed Monday such administrative leaves are paid.

In February, Guth was awarded a sabbatical that was to begin in spring 2014 to research how rural community journalists survive in the 21st century.


Join the discussion

is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service