Missouri criticizes Mark Woodworth’s claims of tainted evidence

03/29/2013 6:25 PM

05/20/2014 10:41 AM

Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster and one of his top prosecutors are firing back at defense lawyers for a Chillicothe man facing a third murder trial in his neighbor’s 1990 death.

A March 22 legal brief from Koster and assistant attorney general Ted Bruce heavily criticizes the legal tactics by Mark Woodworth’s defense lawyers, who claimed in a Feb. 18 hearing in Platte City that a private detective tampered with ballistics evidence used to convict Woodworth of fatally shooting farm wife Cathy Robertson while she slept.

The state’s brief says attorneys Bob Ramsey and Michelle Puckett-Burkhead relied on “hearsay upon hearsay” and faulty speculation while ignoring previous testimony about the role of private investigator Terry Deister, who was hired by Robertson’s family but wound up leading a Livingston County sheriff’s office investigation that had stalled two years after the shooting.

Woodworth, now 38, was 16 when the wife of his father’s farming partner was killed. The victim’s husband, Lyndel Robertson, was shot several times but survived. Doctors later removed a bullet from his liver that, along with fingerprints on an ammunition box from Robertson’s shed, were used to link Woodworth to the crime. The high school dropout’s presumed motive was anger over the dissolving business partnership.

Woodworth was first convicted in 1995 and briefly released on appeal, then was convicted by a second jury in 1999 and sentenced to life in prison.

The Missouri Supreme Court overturned his conviction in January over evidence that it said his lawyers never received. Woodworth was released on bail in February pending the new trial.

Ramsey called the state’s response a sign of desperation.

“They’re drawing real semantic differences here that don’t amount to much,” he said Friday.

Platte County Circuit Judge Owens Lee Hull Jr. didn’t immediately rule on the request to exclude the ballistics evidence or several other defense motions but said he expects to do so as soon as next week. Ramsey said the judge wanted to set a July trial date but hasn’t yet after the state requested more time to prepare.


Join the Discussion

The Kansas City Star is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Terms of Service