Too busy taking pictures of grandkids to play with them
04/28/2014 1:00 PM
04/29/2014 8:30 PM
Neither my husband nor I likes having our pictures taken. My in-laws have thousands of pictures of all of us already.
The biggest problem is that they don’t have a relationship with their grandchildren because of this. They complain that the kids “don’t like them.”
They feel they should therefore visit more often, but in reality, these visits consist of nonstop photo-snapping and no quality time is spent with either of the children. How do I make this stop without causing problems? — Out of Focus in New York
DEAR OUT OF FOCUS:
A diplomatic approach would be to suggest to your in-laws that they “shoot” only for a limited time when they visit — no longer than the first 10 minutes. Explain that you realize the kids are growing and changing quickly, and you understand their desire to record all of it, but the children need a deeper kind of interaction with their grandparents in order to form a positive bond with them.
Then suggest some ways they can relate to the little ones after the camera is put away.
If they balk, tell them the reason their grandchildren don’t seem to like them is that children need face-to-face and eye contact, and the camera has prevented it from happening. If they’re smart, they’ll listen.Boyfriend might be jealous of dog
DEAR ABBY: I’m a 43-year-old woman who has been in a relationship with a man I dated many years ago, “Charles.” When we reconnected three years ago, I had a dog, “Frosty.”
One year into the relationship, Charles asked me to get rid of Frosty because he thinks dogs are unsanitary. I loved Frosty and kept him, but it caused all kinds of problems with my boyfriend.
When Charles and I moved in together three months ago, he insisted I get rid of Frosty and I caved. I miss my little friend so much it hurts. Memories of him are everywhere.
I am able to get him back, but is it crazy that I would jeopardize my relationship because I want to keep my dog? — In the Doghouse
DEAR IN THE DOGHOUSE:
I don’t think it’s crazy, and I’m sure my animal-loving readers — who number in the millions — would agree with me. People bond with their pets to such an extent that in the event of a natural disaster, some of them refuse to be separated from their companions.
That Charles would insist you get rid of Frosty shows extreme insensitivity for your feelings, in addition to disregard for your beloved pet in whom you had a significant emotional investment. Could Charles be jealous of the affection you have shown Frosty? Not knowing him, I can’t guess. But if you are forced to choose between the two of them, you should seriously consider choosing the dog.
© Universal Uclick 4/29
Join the Discussion
The Kansas City Star is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.