Formal address a mark of respect
07/04/2013 4:00 PM
07/06/2013 7:43 PM
For example, receptionists, bank tellers, store associates and others whom I have never met seem to believe that it is appropriate to call me by my first name. I do not know when this familiarity became acceptable. But I am old enough to remember when black women in the South — the area where I was born and lived my formative years — were never afforded the title Miss, Mrs. and now, I suppose, Ms.
Members of the majority population deemed the title one that conveyed gentility, class origins, purity of race and body — statuses to which women like my mother and I could not lay claim. (Histories of black women teachers recount the campaign to be called by these titles.) It might be that I still smart from that memory; it might just be that I am old enough to recall when people asked for the privilege of this familiarity.
Often I say to the stranger who reads my name from my credit card or identification, “My name is Ms. ——-.” However, frequently the addresser does not understand the hint.
So have rules of etiquette changed this markedly? If they have, but I choose to remain old-fashioned, how do I make my request about the term of address known short of an aggressive correction?
This is what comes of people thinking they can change etiquette rules without Miss Manners’ permission.
The practice of denying titles of respect to African-Americans (and female office workers, household employees, and whoever else was dismissed as inferior or childlike) violated the most basic requirement of manners, which is to show respect for others.
It took an unconscionably long time for people to realize this. But it happened in a period when the bizarre notion prevailed that the pretense of universal friendship would solve the world’s problems. The greatest proponents actually urged hugging strangers, formerly known as assault, as a form of philanthropic therapy.
And so when it was recognized that forms of address needed to be equalized, the solution that Miss Manners would have thought obvious — granting titles of respect to all — was bypassed. Instead, equality was to mean that nobody would be entitled to that dignity. Under the pseudo-friendship model, people were no longer allowed to chose their own friends.
Well, that’s how things changed. But, as you no doubt gather, it is not an authorized change, and you do not have to accept it. You will, of course, be polite, knowing that the offenders are ignorant of the history, but you should be insistent. If the first correction makes no impression, you should said, “Excuse me, but I said I prefer to be addressed as Ms. (surname).”Bridal shower etiquette
DEAR MISS MANNERS: Would you please tell me what is the proper etiquette for inviting someone to a bridal shower if they will not be invited to the wedding? Is that an appropriate thing to do?
The proper etiquette is: don’t. Miss Manners wonders why anyone would think that someone not close enough to be welcome at the wedding would want to participate in a less important but more intimate gathering.
© Universal Uclick 7/5
Join the Discussion
The Kansas City Star is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.