One of the worst epithets that can be leveled at a politician these days is to call him a redistributionist. Yet 2013 marked one of the biggest redistributions in recent American history a redistribution upward, from average working people to the owners of America.
By ROBERT REICH
Tribune Content Agency
The stock market ended 2013 at an all-time high giving stockholders their biggest annual gain in almost two decades. Most Americans didnt share in those gains, however, because most people havent been able to save enough to invest in the stock market. More than two-thirds of Americans live from paycheck to paycheck.
Even if you include the value of IRAs, most shares of stock are owned by the very wealthy. The richest 1 percent of Americans owns 35 percent of the value of American-owned shares. The richest 10 percent owns over 80 percent.
What does this have to do with redistribution? Some might argue the stock market is just a giant casino. Since its owned mostly by the wealthy, a rise in stock prices simply reflects a transfer of wealth from some of the rich (who cashed in their shares too early) to others of the rich (who bought shares early enough and held on to them long enough to reap the big gains).
But this neglects the fact that stock prices track corporate profits. The relationship isnt exact, and price-earnings ratios move up and down in the short term. Yet over the slightly longer term, share prices do correlate with profits. And 2013 was a banner year for profits.
Heres where redistribution comes in. American corporations didnt make most of their money from increased sales (although their foreign sales did increase). They made their big bucks mostly by reducing their costs especially their biggest single cost: wages.
They push wages down because most workers no longer have any bargaining power when it comes to determining pay. The continuing high rate of unemployment including a record number of long-term jobless, and a large number who have given up looking for work altogether has allowed employers to set the terms.
For years, the bargaining power of American workers has also been eroding due to ever more efficient means of outsourcing abroad, new computer software that can replace almost any routine job, and an ongoing shift of full-time to part-time and contract work. And unions have been decimated. In the 1950s, over a third of private-sector workers were members of labor unions. Now, fewer than 7 percent are unionized.
All this helps explain why corporate profits have been increasing throughout this recovery (they grew over 18 percent in 2013 alone) while wages have been dropping. Corporate earnings now represent the largest share of the gross domestic product and wages the smallest share of GDP since records have been kept.
Hence, the Great Redistribution.
Some might say this doesnt really amount to a redistribution as we normally define that term, because government isnt redistributing anything. By this view, the declining wages, higher profits and the surging bull market simply reflect the workings of the free market.
But this overlooks the fact that government sets the rules of the game. Federal and state budgets have been cut, for example thereby reducing overall demand and keeping unemployment higher than otherwise. Congress has repeatedly rejected tax incentives designed to encourage more hiring. States have adopted right-to-work laws that undercut unions. And so on.
Whats more, the tax system is rigged in favor of the owners of wealth, and against people whose income comes from wages. Wealth is taxed at a lower rate than labor.
America has been redistributing upward for some time after all, trickle-down economics turned out to be trickle up but we outdid ourselves in 2013. At a time of record inequality, America conducted a Great Redistribution upward.
Robert Reich, a former U.S. labor secretary, is a professor of public policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He blogs at RobertReich.org.