Don't Kill The Mellinger

Twitter Tuesday: Chiefs joy, Royals moves, Embiid vs. Wiggins, Charles vs. Manning, postseason awards, and Ervin Santana

Updated: 2013-12-17T02:43:38Z


The Kansas City Star

In case you were curious, or had a friend trying to make a silly argument, the Chiefs will not be resting their starters or otherwise playing this week against the Colts any differently with the high probability that they’ll be playing the Colts again in the first round of the playoffs two weeks later.

For one, it’s not how football people typically operate, to concede any point now with the hope of gaining two points later.

For two, the Chiefs still have a chance to win the AFC West. They will need to win out, and hope the Broncos lose or tie either this week against the Texans or next week against the Raiders, but, well, crazier things have happened.

And for three, there is a feeling around the team that they have some momentum going here, and that momentum is particularly important for this group (9-0 start, 0-3 skid, and now 101 points during a 2-0 rebound) and so why would they willingly give any of that up?

They’re going to play hard, play to win, for better or worse.

And if it’s worth anything, the official stance here at DKTM is that it’s for the better.

This week’s eating recommendation is the burnt ends sandwich at Bates City Barbecue, and the reading recommendation is Lee Jenkins on Peyton Manning, SI’s Sportsman of the Year.

As always, thanks for your help and for reading.


…tough crowd. In my defense, I had a toddler in my left arm as I typed this.

OK, well, when it’s there on the screen it doesn’t sound like much of a defense.

Let’s just move on.

One of the greatest turnarounds in NFL history.

From effectively pushing fans away to pulling them back in, from unlikable to noise records, from what was basically a mutual hatred between fans and the front office to more of a synergy.

Like the Chiefs president told Vahe, "Kansas City is a better place to be when we’re successful."

And the Chiefs are better when they remember the relationship goes both ways.

This is a distinct possibility and, I lost track, but also something like the 4,278,382nd good argument about why a Pro Bowl spot means less than a wireless hotspot.

^ With a Pro Bowl spot, you still might be Matt Cassel . With a hotspot, you can buy a $7.85 million house with bitcoin.

Jamaal Charles, Tamba Hali and Derrick Johnson are locks. Eric Berry should, perhaps, be in that category as well. Justin Houston has played well enough, but I’m curious if the injury clouds things. And Dontari Poe will be in the discussion, but it’s a loaded year for interior defensive linemen (a little less loaded with Geno Atkins’ injury).

Throw in Dustin Colquitt, and at least the way I see it, you have seven possibilities. My guess is that five of them make it.

Lamar’s is an institution, but I gotta be honest here: I had Donut King for the first time a few weeks ago and, well, I’m going to do some more investigative journalism before making a final decision here.

At the risk of bringing back the Dear Sammy stuff from a few weeks ago, here is some free advice:

Make your Christmas gifts about both of you. Make them something you do together, and give each other. Otherwise, the necklace you buy won’t be shiny enough or the dress you get will be the wrong size^.

^ And no matter which way you go, too big or too small, that’s a bad move.

Go in on something together, though, and you both put thought into it and come out with something you’re stoked. That’s what we do, anyway, and it’s revolutionized the Christmas experience for me.

Like, a few years ago, we went to Costa Rica. Best Christmas gift ever.

Both, really. I touched on this a bit in the Insta-reaction, but it’s a strange thing that the defense is now what’s concerning. I guess you can look at it however you want, but if you get seven turnovers, you shouldn’t be giving up 31 points to a team that hasn’t scored that many all season.

Not if you consider yourself a team built on defense, anyway.

Some of this is Justin Houston’s absence, obviously, but the thing shouldn’t be this fragile. Mostly — and I realize this is an oversimplification — teams are figuring out how to beat the Chiefs with quick passes and the secondary is getting exposed when it has to cover for more than 2 ½ seconds or so. At the beginning of the year, their aggressiveness was working in beautiful, destructive harmony with the pass rush, but as teams adjusted they’ve found ways to expose all three cornerbacks.

I’m not saying it’s broken.

But it does need some maintenance.

Yes, absolutely, and this is an important point.

I see what you did there.

Nobody asked about the Jack Harry drama last week, and I didn’t care enough to bring it up on my own.

But there are a couple takeaways here:

- The noise that came out of his mouth sure sounded like "Gayhawks."

- I don’t believe Jack meant to say it. If you watch the video, Frank Boal doesn’t react. It looks like a heat-of-the-TV-lights thing that nobody notices. It looks, to me, anyway, like he misspoke on live TV in an incredibly unfortunate way.

- He made it worse by pretending it was 1956 and people couldn’t pull up the video on their phones. I’m not sure why he didn’t just say, "I stumbled my words, I meant to say ‘Jayhawks.’ The words just caught in my mouth and I misspoke. I would never use a slur like that and I apologize."

- The backlash against him was made worse by Jack’s track record. He’s built a sort of character with #hotsportstakes meant to gratuitously get the message boards going so, hey, it’s not that as much of a stretch as it should be when something like this happens.

- I said this on Twitter, but the reaction from local media person A when local media person B has drama is almost always about how A feels about B, not the drama. Jack goes on one of the local radio stations, for instance, so without listening to any of it I can be fairly certain how each station treated the drama.

- I know your question was a joke, but I’ll answer it anyway. One of the great parts of my job is that I have a delete button and copy editors. I’ve never written a slur, but I did once file a story about someone who I described as having a "self-defecating sense of humor." Copy editors are the best people on earth.

Well, sure. Absolutely it is. The reminders of how far they’ve come are everywhere, including that last year, the Chiefs played in Oakland about the same time of year and I remember it as the first time Jamaal Charles spoke to reporters after the Jovan Belcher murder-suicide that hit Charles harder than any other Chief.

This time, Charles is smiling in front of TV cameras and talking about what he called "probably my best game of my career."

All that said, these feelings are fleeting. If the Chiefs lose in the first round of the playoffs, I will bet you a year’s supply of Tank 7 that questions for this here Twitter Tuesday will be filled with Why can’t the Chiefs ever win a playoff game? and Isn’t it time the Chiefs and Royals stop being satisfied with being just good enough to not be embarrassing?

One last point: barring something dramatic, this will be the Chiefs’ best chance of winning a playoff game in a decade.

I wouldn’t, really. Maybe I’m supposed to feel like the Chiefs are getting hosed here, but why shouldn’t there be a reward for winning the division?

I guess you could rework it so that a team in the Chiefs’ position would at least get the playoff game at home, if not the bye, but I like that winning the division means something.

The Chiefs had two chances at the Broncos, and didn’t get it done. The Broncos should get credit for that.

I didn’t realize this before Sunday, but the NFL record for receiving yards by a running back is 271 held by … former Chief Curtis McClinton.

If we’re just talking about offense — because Derrick Thomas’ seven sacks will be tough to top — Charles goes right to the top of the list with McClinton, Stephone Paige’s 309 yards receiving against the Chargers in 1985, or anything that Priest Holmes, Larry Johnson, Barry Word or Christian Okoye ever did.

Or, think of it like this: Charles will probably have his name included in the Chiefs’ Ring of Honor, and he thinks this was the best game of his career.

Strong cases, both of them. Ron Rivera, Bruce Arians, Sean Payton, and Pete Carroll will be among those who get some love for the coach award. I’d have to look a little harder at executive of the year, but I can’t think of anyone who’d have a stronger case than Dorsey.

Actually, I don’t think owners are eligible. But Clark Hunt has a good argument here.

Both the coach and executive of the year will be really interesting, because Reid’s and Dorsey’s cases are fairly simple and straightforward: they took over a dysfunctional organization that was actively disliked by fans, bad enough to pick first in the draft, and are now 11-3, a playoff spot clinched, and currently tied for the second-best record in the NFL.

Now, the interesting part is whether voters take into account why everything was so dysfunctional last year. All that talk about how the Chiefs were the most talented 2-14 team in NFL history last year, well, the flip side of that is that the football world recognized that there was talent here. Six Pro Bowlers, a consensus for a quick turnaround candidate, all of those things are real.

I’m not arguing against Reid and Dorsey — I’d need to hear a really good case for someone else — but it’s inaccurate if someone says they built something here out of nothing.

Charles has a lot less help than Manning, especially when you look at the offensive line^ Chiefs are a -13.8 run blocking). But this is an incomplete argument.

^ Pro Football Focus has the Chiefs at -13.8 run blocking, and the Broncos at +40.7 pass blocking.

Manning is having, perhaps, the best year a quarterback has ever had. Some of that is undoubtedly the way the game is officiated, and some fantastic receivers. But Manning is the one that makes that team go, and the Broncos will probably win the division and certainly beat the Chiefs twice.

Take Charles off the Chiefs, and they’re fairly screwed on offense. But take Manning off the Broncos, and the same thing happens to them.

Manning will win the MVP award, and unless something crazy happens these last two weeks, it’ll be well-deserved.

But Charles has a great argument for the offensive player of the year award.

I doubt it. The payroll is over $90 million now, and even if David Glass could extend it a bit more and be covered financially, he’s shown sufficient commitment that he’s not the problem.

I’d also ask you who the pitcher is?

Ervin Santana is the obvious answer, but he’s going to be overpaid, in years or dollars or both. I’ve said this before, but: I love watching Santana pitch. I liked watching him last year more than any pitcher the Royals have had in two decades, save Zack Greinke and, perhaps, Joakim Soria at the heights of their respective powers.

But he’s 31 years old, with a history of elbow problems and wildly inconsistent seasons. If you could be sure that Santana in 2014 (32 years old), 2015 (33 years old) and 2016 (34 years old) will be as good as this past season, sure, he’s worth it.

But every bit of logic says you should be sure that won’t happen.

He might be, and this is something that’s been coming for a while. But I also think the Embiid-over-Wiggins stuff has a little hype backlash in it.

Embiid is the new thing, Wiggins old news, as dumb as that sounds when they’re both freshmen who’ve played a total of 10 college games.

Embiid is a legitimate 7-feet tall, with a soccer forward’s feet, a somewhat soft touch and a relentless energy and ambition. He’s averaging 9.8 points, 6.6 rebounds and 2.4 blocks while hitting 66 percent of his shots.

But Wiggins is still an otherworldly athlete, with a good handle, improving skills, and unfair ability in the open floor. He’s averaging 15.9 points and 5.9 rebounds while shooting 48 percent (54 percent on two-pointers). He hasn’t been a combination of Michael Jordan, Wilt Chamberlain and Johnny Damn Unitas yet, but he’s also scored 159 points on 108 shots.

I guess I’d put it like this: Wiggins would still be my bet, if it was even money. But for people who haven’t seen Embiid, it’s a lot closer than they would think.

Bullpen catcher is a vastly underrated job, but right now, I’m thinking about Jimmy Nielsen turning into the center of a wild celebration for, let’s be honest, not really making that last save.

That’s a good gig.

I mean, I’d be shocked if that happened, but if Wright said that, well, he knows Meyer a lot better than I do.

You’re not insane, is what I’m saying. But…

…Darrin here, well, we disagree.

OK, that’s not bad.

One million dollars on barbecue sauce, $500,000 on Christmas lights, another $500,000 on fireworks, and then whatever it takes to play some elaborate practical joke on St. Louis.

Like, supplying all the Italian places with Ragu.

Or paying Skip Schumaker to say he prefers Peoria.

Then, with whatever’s left … a fountain, of barbecue sauce.

Well, everything about the fan engagement is in this column.

But about the winning, I don’t believe that Sporting wants to win more than the Chiefs or Royals. They’re just better at it, at least right now. Somehow, even in a league where player salaries are virtual tip money compared to the NFL or MLB, and playing in a gorgeous stadium paid for in large part with public money, there are many fans and some media who seem to think Sporting’s owners are bankrolling themselves to victories.

Actually, the team is very much in the bottom half in MLS payroll, and the owners spend FAR less of their own personal money on their team than David Glass or Clark Hunt.

I adore most everything Sporting does with their team.

But let’s be realistic here.

Their genius is in the way they communication and empower their fans.

This question makes me feel more get-off-my-lawn than I’m comfortable with, but no. I don’t know who Lorde is, other than I suspect this is the group^ that came out with that "Royals" song a while back that turned out to be maybe, kinda, pseudo inspired by George Brett?

^ Or singer? Whatever.

Am I close?

But, no. I will not go. I’ll stay home, and talk about when concert tickets used to be a nickel.

Also: I think they planted that George-Brett-inspired-our-song thing to generate ticket sales. Don’t fall into the trap, kids.

Let me answer it this way: my unborn children may be grown the next time the chances are this high again.

Or, let me answer it another way…

…the Royals, for a lot of reasons, really need to make this count. James Shields will be a free agent after the season, and he’ll be a better long-term investment than Ervin Santana is at the moment, but if Santana’s price is too high for the Royals^ then Shields’ price will likely be WAY too high for the Royals.

^ Santana remains unsigned. He made noises about a $100 million contract at the start of the offseason. I wrote here that the Royals would be wise to offer around three years and $45 million and unwise to go higher. I still think it’s an enormous longshot, but the chances are slightly higher than I would’ve expected before the season. Lloyd Christmas has it about right here:

Anyway, the team that signs Santana will lose a first-round pick, and Kyle Lohse went through a similar ordeal last year before getting three years and $33 million. Santana will certainly beat that number, but the rule will diminish what he’d otherwise get.

So, anyway, let’s answer the questions: my prediction on Dec. 17 is for 90 wins, and a 40 percent chance at the playoffs.


I really like what they’ve done. People will continue to be hung up on losing Santana — and the Royals will be hard-pressed to replace what he did last year — while forgetting that Santana will be hard-pressed to duplicate what he did last year.

The offense should be much, much better. The bullpen should be as good. If anything, the defense should be better. If the rotation can be even close to what it was last year — 80 percent — this should be a better team.

If they threw beer at you, and afterward you wore leather pants with black sneakers that had gold chains for shoelaces, then yes.

Deal Saver Subscribe today!


The Kansas City Star is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Kansas City Star uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here