816

April vote likely on bond issue for Lee’s Summit interchange

Updated: 2013-12-12T05:04:35Z

By RUSS PULLEY

Special to The Star

The Lee’s Summit City Council has agreed to ask voters next spring to approve a $10 million bond issue to help reconstruct the interchange at U.S. 50 and Missouri 291 South.

The council voted this month to draft an ordinance calling for the April election, but will need a final vote to approve it.

The Missouri Department of Transportation plans to replace the Jefferson Street bridge over U.S. 50 in the next five years for safety reasons, said Matt Killion, area engineer with the agency. Because of budget constraints, it does not plan to make the bridge wider or do other work to ease congestion.

Killion said MoDOT would be interested in sharing costs with Lee’s Summit for a more extensive makeover, but the agency won’t fully commit to cost sharing until it considers other projects in a statewide, competitive process.

State money could cover 40 to 50 percent of the Lee’s Summit project, which MoDOT now thinks will cost $16.1 million. A preliminary estimate was $10 million.

That left council members facing whether to ask voters for enough to fully fund the interchange, in case the project isn’t accepted by MoDOT, or only ask for the city share.

“Do we really want to put a $16 million bond issue before voters?” Holland said. “I’m a little reluctant to do that.”

Holland said he could accept $8 million or $10 million.

Council member Ed Cockrell said the city should ask for $10 million, enough to cover its possible share and to allow for unknowns.

MoDOT is to announce its decision on the cost sharing by March 14. If the project fails to get the matching money, the city can pull the plug, he said.

“I could tell voters to turn it down, it’s over,” Cockrell said.

His view prevailed on a 5-2 vote, with Bob Johnson and David Mosby voting no.

Killion told the council the agency has three possible configurations for the new interchange and each costs about $16 million.

He said he wasn’t able to explain the large difference from earlier estimates, other than some design factors had been left out of preliminary estimate.

“We’re very confident with the new one,” he said.

Deal Saver Subscribe today!

Comments

The Kansas City Star is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Kansas City Star uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here