If you peruse the news on any given day, the farm bill/food stamp debate produces two general impressions: Republicans are heartless turkey thieves; Democrats are spendthrift welfare caterers.
By KATHLEEN PARKER
The Washington Post
As with tabloid stories, theres always a smidgen of truth in the headlines. Yet surely, too, there is some middle ground between such harshly ideological views. But no. We have grown fond of the facile and have wandered far from any willingness to meet halfway.
The holiday season provides fresh corridors of shame.
Imprinted on the collective mind is a craftily placed message: Republicans dont care about poor people. Distilling further, given that Republicans are mostly white and the welfare model is associated with the Ronald Reagan-generated, African-American welfare queen the inference can be made that Republicans dont care about non-whites. Ergo, Republicans are selfish, greedy haters.
While the foregoing is not really true in any significant way (racists exist but dont define the GOP any more than a few welfare scammers define the vast majority of food-stamp recipients), Republicans are nothing if not committed to executing their partys operating principle cut spending at all costs no matter the consequences or political repercussions. While Senate Democrats want to reduce food-stamp spending by $4.5 billion over 10 years, House Republicans want to cut $39 billion, primarily by getting tougher on qualifications.
Republicans seem equally committed to handing their plates to President Barack Obama for second and third helpings of scorn and ridicule, even as their fortune cookie reads: Youre winning, shut up!
Whether Republicans are correct on the economic merits of spending cuts is politically less significant than the more-urgent reality of perception. What could seem more heartless than cutting nutrition aid for 47 million poor people, including 210,000 children whose school meals likely would be eliminated or reduced, in the midst of an anemic recovery from recession, a still-lousy job market and, as Sperling pointed out, the holiday season. Forget optics, this is the visceral equivalent of puppy mills.
Heres the proper GOP message: Our entire entitlement system needs reform, but now is not the time to cut food stamps. This is because people still cant find work thanks to a sluggish economy that this administrations policies have failed to improve and the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is merely making worse.
Oh, stop, its not THAT brilliant, then again
While the ACA continues to dog Democrats, and the president continues to use his executive power to usurp Congress role in amending the law, Republicans could seek ways to help poor people eat better food, perhaps by tying nutrition education to food-stamp subsidies. Wait, the previous farm bill did just that through education and nutrition incentives. Instead, Republicans want to cut nutrition education, though they do want to make certain types of unhealthy foods off-limits to food-stamp users.
This seems not so much heartless as brainless. The party that wants to teach a man to fish; whose most-recent presidential nominee advocated self-deportation of illegal immigrants; and which has mocked New York Mayor Michael Bloombergs nannification of food choices doesnt seem much bothered by limiting individual choice when it comes to poor folk.
Wouldnt nutrition education illuminating smart choices be a wiser, more-conservative path than just saying no? When it comes to health care, reducing obesity, the second leading cause of preventable death behind smoking, should be a bipartisan, national imperative.
Thus, wise Republicans should meet Democrats in the middle on this one, not only because keeping nutrition aid and education in place is the right thing to do but because more people needing help merely underscores the conservative view that Democratic policies are making the job market worse and more people hungry.
When your opponent is headed into a perfect storm, why follow him?
To reach Washington Post columnist Kathleen Parker, send email to email@example.com.