Even if it takes a change to the law, the president should honor the commitment the federal government made to those people and let them keep what they got. Bill Clinton, Nov. 12
By CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER
The Washington Post
So the former president asserts that the current president continues to dishonor his you like your plan, you can keep your plan pledge. And calls for the Affordable Care Act to be changed, despite furious White House resistance to the very idea.
Coming from the dean of the Democratic Party, this one line marked the breaching of the dam. It legitimized the brewing rebellion of panicked Democrats against Obamacare. By late last week, President Barack Obama had been forced into a rear-guard holding action, asking insurers to grant a one-year extension of current plans.
The damage to the Obama presidency, however, is already done. His approval rating has fallen to 39 percent, his lowest ever.
At stake, however, is more than the fate of one presidency or of the current Democratic majority in the Senate. At stake is the new, more ambitious, social-democratic brand of American liberalism introduced by Obama, of which Obamacare is both symbol and concrete embodiment.
Precisely when the GOP was returning to a more constitutionalist conservatism committed to reforming, restructuring and reining in the welfare state, Obama offered a transformational liberalism designed to expand the role of government, enlarge the welfare state and create yet new entitlements.
The centerpiece of this vision is Obamacare, the most sweeping social reform in the last half-century, affecting one-sixth of the economy and directly touching the most vital area of life of every citizen.
As the only socially transformational legislation in modern American history to be enacted on a straight party-line vote, Obamacare is wholly owned by the Democrats. For four years, this debate has been theoretical. Now its real. And for Democrats, its a disaster.
It begins with the bungled rollout. If Washington cant even do the website the literal portal to this brave new world how does it propose to regulate the vast ecosystem of American medicine?
Second, arrogance. Five million freely chosen, freely purchased health care plans are summarily canceled. Why? Because they dont meet some arbitrary standard set by the experts in Washington.
Lastly, deception. The essence of the entitlement state is government giving away free stuff. Hence Obamacare would provide insurance for 30 million uninsured, while giving everybody tons of free medical services without adding one dime to our deficits, promised Obama.
This being inherently impossible, there had to be a catch. Now we know it: hidden subsidies. Toss millions of the insured off their plans and onto the Obamacare exchanges where they would be forced into more expensive insurance packed with coverage they dont want and dont need so that the overcharge can be used to subsidize others.
The reaction to the incompetence, arrogance and deception has ranged from ridicule to anger. But more is in jeopardy than just panicked congressional Democrats. If Obamacare goes down, there will be little left of its underlying ideology.
Perhaps it wont go down. Perhaps the web portal hums beautifully on Nov. 30. Perhaps theyll find a way to restore the canceled policies without wrecking the financial underpinning of the exchanges.
Perhaps. The more likely scenario, however, is that Obamacare does fail. It either fails politically, renounced by a wide consensus that includes a growing number of Democrats. Or it succumbs to the financial complications of the very amendments desperately tacked on to save it.
If it does fail, the effect will be historic. Obamacare will take down with it more than Mary Landrieu and Co. It will discredit Obamas new liberalism for years to come.
To reach Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.