Don't Kill The Mellinger

Twitter Tuesday: Talking Chiefs, Shuttlecocks, Mizzou

Updated: 2013-10-22T19:12:21Z

By SAM MELLINGER

The Kansas City Star

The Chiefs won another one-point game at home, this time against a team playing without its star running back and without its starting quarterback^, helped in part with a touchdown scored on a phantom zone read to Alex Smith’s invisible friend, wake up in a world where the Broncos lose to a team that has to play the Chiefs at Arrowhead without its star receiver, and you might’ve heard that they play the Browns this weekend at home.

^ Though the backup was pretty good, and the starter has been pretty crappy.

And then the Bills.

And then a week off to better prepare for what would be the biggest win of the season.

Got all that?

A lot of you are asking, so for now I’ll just say: this Chiefs season is the strongest threat to The Curse Of The Shuttlecocks we’ve had yet.

This week’s eating recommendation is the pad thai at Thai Place and the reading recommendation is this typically thoughtful and powerful piece by the terrific Jeff MacGregor on sexual assault and football culture.

Let’s get to it, and as always, thanks for your help and for reading.

I think it’ll be done by the end of the regular season, which the Chiefs will finish 15-1 because they’ll rest their starters for the last game.

I’m old enough to remember when Mizzou was getting beat up in the SEC, and the Chiefs were not only terrible but unlikable.

Depends what you think of John Fox and Peyton Manning as coaches^. Me, I think they’re both pretty good. And we didn’t need to see the loss in Indy to know the way to beat the Broncos is to get after the quarterback, but it does help to see it play out.

^ See what I did there?

The problem with it — and this is something Collinsworth talked about a few times on the broadcast — is Manning is too smart to let one strategy beat him. When he knows the pass rush is coming, he adjusts, and gets the ball out too quickly, often in less than two seconds.

I do think the Chiefs are well equipped to match up with the Broncos, especially with the emergence of Marcus Cooper. And winning the division is much more of a 50-50 proposition than I would’ve thought even a week or two ago.

But it’s much more complicated than, "Hey, just do what Robert Mathis did."

I can’t say too much about it, other than to confirm the Shuttlecock committee is looking into it. This entire Chiefs season has sort of turned the committee on its head, as you can imagine.

Slow down. Not yet.

And the verdict is … good. Boulevard’s standard is very high, and the Quad in general is not my jam … but the bourbon undertones are a nice touch. It’s just that when I think of Boulevard Smokestacks, the standard is Terra Ingognito and, bless us all, Saison Brett.

I’m assuming that by "structural disadvantages" you mean a home stadium with a track in it, a state without a ton of local high school talent and an in-state rival that regularly beats you down.

And I know I’m kind of on an island here, but I’ll say it anyway: the KU job isn’t as bad as many think, or as bad as Turner Gill and now Charlie Weis are making it out to be.

I’m not saying this is a great job, or a sleeping giant, or any of that stuff. But you can win at KU. You can build it into the kind of program that goes to a bowl game two or three times out of five years, with the occasional season good enough to dent the top 25. There have been massive facility upgrades in the last decade, with more planned.

You just need the right coach.

I’m not sure I’d pigeon hole it like you’re suggesting. I’d just try to find the best man possible, with an emphasis on someone the fan base will get behind^. Weis is making $2.5 million a year at KU, and as long as that’s the payscale, you should expect to be able to hire a good coach. There’s still time for Weis to prove himself as that coach, but the clock is ticking.

^ I know that was part of the idea with Weis, but there was a strong scent of desperation on that from the beginning.

I hate it. Makes me sad, as much as something that really doesn’t affect my life can make me sad. I understand that the company will still be based here, will still employ a lot of people here, and they’ll still make delicious beer that says Kansas City on the label and all of that.

But it won’t be the same.

It’s no longer this small company in Kansas City that made it big. It has corporate ownership. Maybe Duvel will make Boulevard better — I really like Duvel, actually — but I think Boulevard was doing just fine without the help^.

^ Other than that terrible Nutcracker Ale they seem intent on making every Christmas.

I also think something is lost in a small company when it’s bought by a big one. I also think all that bragging Boulevard’s been doing about being the biggest brewery in Missouri, and making fun of Budweiser’s America-themed advertisements after being bought by InBev looks a little silly now. John McDonald is going to get richer, and good for him. He deserves it. I wish the company all the success in the world. I hope they continue to make delicious beer and sell it to more and more people.

But something is going to be lost in the transition, and I’ll be a little sad about that.

I’m sure a Tank 7 will make me feel better. I also think there are other good beers I’ll try.

It’s a good line, and I’m not trying to take anything away … but there are still some WAY defensive fans around these parts.

Like the people who do The Wave (especially in key moments of a game) and men who propose to their girlfriends on JumboTrons, it’s hard for me to articulate just how badly I hate this but I’ll have fun trying:

You all sound like fools.

Stop it.

Shut up.

For your sake, and ours.

The inferiority complex is as strange as it is annoying. It’s an awful look. The Chiefs are having a fabulous season, and every second you spend complaining about what Bomani Jones or any other national media member says about you would be better spent giving yourself a swirly.

If your joy as a sports fan is tied to what someone you’ll never meet says about them, you’re doing it wrong. Besides, the season isn’t even halfway done yet. Your team won two games last year, and was generally the biggest embarrassment in football in a league that included the Jacksonville Jaguars. So if someone wants to see more than two good months before anointing the Chiefs the ’85 Bears, it’s a perfectly logical stance. They are not kicking your dog, or calling your wife fat.

This isn’t college football, where the ties are often more personal and territorial and where — most importantly — outside opinion actually DOES matter because of polls. The Chiefs will have their chance against the Colts. They’ll have their chance against the Broncos. Twice. They’ll have their chance in the playoffs.

But in the meantime, go ahead and obsess over what’s said about them on a pregame show. Because that makes a lot of sense.

I’m all in. Especially if it ends up like this:

Are you sure he wouldn’t give Franklin the job back because he’s a senior whom his teammates respect immensely, completed 67.5 percent of his passes with 14 touchdowns and three interceptions (three more touchdowns and 4.5 yards per carry on the ground) before he got hurt?

Because … that’s why I think he’d do it.

As many as Baylor wants, probably, but it’s worth noting that defense hasn’t been what’s keeping KU on track to preserve and extend that 24-game conference losing streak.

The defense has been good enough. Teams will make bowl games with worse defenses than KU has this year.

It’s the offense that’s a mess, which is another red flag about Charlie Weis — big money coach with a great reputation for offense now burning through his second hand-picked quarterback.

Yup.

Especially in that it happened during the Broncos game, with Indy already up. The Chiefs have an advantage here. Denver lost at Indy; the Chiefs get the Colts at home, where they might not lose. Denver plays at New England next month (and at Houston in December, the Texans are talented enough to make that interesting), while the Chiefs’ toughest remaining out-of-division road game is … what, Washington?

I think I’ve said this a few weeks in a row now, but the focus has very much shifted from just don’t start another fan revolt into just be competitive into just get into the playoffs and now into win the division and advance in the playoffs.

I understand that the Chiefs have lost four home playoff games since they’ve won one, and that those four teams went a combined 31-1 at home in the regular season.

But this would be a mother of a team to have to beat on the road in the playoffs.

Like I say, the Shuttlecock committee has a lot to discuss.

No, that’s just silly.

But maybe Jesse Palmer.

Oh, they’ll make a bowl game. It’s more likely K-State will win out than it is they’ll miss a bowl game.

The North Dakota State fiasco is inexcusable — save it with the but North Dakota State is actually pretty good! talk, please — but the other three losses are defensible and fine. The conference schedule is front-loaded. Baylor and Oklahoma State may be the best two teams in the league, and K-State played at Texas on the wrong week. There are no blowouts.

K-State gets crappy West Virginia at home, Iowa State at home, crappy TCU at home, and Kansas. There’s your four wins for a bowl game, and you have a chance to steal one in Lubbock or against OU at home.

Weird thing: I’ve felt all season that I think K-State is better than most K-State fans.

We tend to watch games from a self-centered view. In other words, a touchdown for our team is a touchdown for our team and a touchdown for the other team is a touchdown given up by our team.

That said, I thought Keenum was excellent. That first touchdown pass was perfect.

That’s just not realistic. He and DGB will split the votes next year.

We lived through 2012, is what we did to deserve it.

Really? I see more of a Mike Moustakas-Jim Harbaugh love child when I see him.

Anybody else?

But then they’ll get the rematch in the BCS game, right?

The key for the Chiefs will be homefield, which obviously means winning the division. And like I said earlier, the chances of that look so much better now than a week or two ago, and this isn’t an overreaction to the Broncos losing in Indianapolis.

The Chiefs have the easier schedule, and will not only get Indy at home but get Indy without Reggie Wayne. Andy Reid’s record off the bye week is absurd, and if the Chiefs could somehow win that game in Denver, then who the hell knows.

Sporting’s chances to make the Cup are hard to figure. They’ve won the East the last two years and been disappointing in the playoffs, obviously. Besler and Zusi give Sporting two premier players at key positions, and the defense is uber stingy. But I’m just going with math here, and not just because this site gives Sporting a 12.5 percent chance of winning the Cup. To get to the Cup, Sporting has to get through two of the — to me, anyway — goofy two-game aggregates. The Chiefs would just have to win one game.

I’m going with the Chiefs.

Noted.

Perfect, so far.

Though I would point out that some — read that right, SOME — of the hate was coming from his own fan base.

I don’t know his or her name, but my first choice would be a chef’s table at whatever chef I determined to be the best in the world after a lot of research once hearing that this is really happening.

If I have to be more specific, I’m getting sushi from Jiro Ono, because seriously.

And if you say, "Sam, can’t your fat face think of anything other than food?" I would say, first of all, don’t judge me, and second of all, I’m going to a show at the Sydney Opera House because look at this place, and, ya-know, that means I’d be in Sydney.

You guys know you think managers matter WAY more than I do, but, yeah, this one helps. Jim Leyland is one of the best, and a great fit for that roster. His players loved him, he’s smart, always has their back, a great manager.

But whoever replaces him is inheriting a nails rotation and Miguel Cabrera.

I think it’s best we all pretend we didn’t see it, and that we never speak of this again.

Deal Saver Subscribe today!

Comments

The Kansas City Star is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere on the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

The Kansas City Star uses Facebook's commenting system. You need to log in with a Facebook account in order to comment. If you have questions about commenting with your Facebook account, click here