WASHINGTON — Redemption is in the air, we keep hearing. Americans dont care about a persons sex life because, well, they have one, too, and, hey, we all have weeds in our garden.
By KATHLEEN PARKER
The Washington Post
Indeed we do, but not all sins are created equal. And though we are quick to forgive the repentant and do believe in second chances we also seem to apply different standards to men and women.
There may be legitimate reasons for this, though they arent likely to be popular. We expect more of women because civilization depends on it. For centuries, weve relied on women to rein in mens passions, to channel mens libidos in constructive ways building suspension bridges, for instance.
Our available data on the double standard is limited in part because fewer women than men are in public office. But also, in the main, women dont behave as men do. The male libido is simply greater, which accounts for both the Sistine Chapel and Attila the Hun.
Popular culture seems determined to change this timeless truth by encouraging girls to be more like boys, and vice versa. The stakes are clear: If girls can be portrayed as just as bad as boys, then males have no obligation to mitigate their natural dominant, exploitive inclinations.
The double-standard test is (sort of) playing out in New York Citys comptroller race, where erstwhile madam Kristin Davis is one of the candidates running against former Gov. Eliot Spitzer (my former TV colleague), to whom she claims to have provided escorts. Judging by Davis own commentary, however, this is more comedy than contest: This is going to be the funnest campaign ever. Whatever her talents, Davis is obviously no match for the former sheriff of Wall Street.
But were they equally competitive otherwise, its a near certainty that voters would be less willing to forgive the woman who provided services than the man who procured them. Thus it has always been.
More on this in a moment, but first a quick visit down South where Mark Sanford orchestrated his own forgiveness, winning election to Congress where he served before becoming South Carolinas governor and Argentinas ardent visitor.
Sanford won despite having wept his way through a cringe-inducing confession and recently had been accused of trespassing on his ex-wifes property. Why did voters elect such a man?
First, because his weaknesses notwithstanding, Sanford is admired by conservatives for his cost-cutting history. Second, his offense, though it included abandoning the state for several days and lying about it, involved something less tawdry. He simply fell in love.
Importantly, he and his now-fiancee were co-equals in a relationship absent any hierarchical power. This is key to the real issue afoot. The current redemption fest, including the San Diego mayor who harassed women in his employ and thinks an apology ought to wrap things up (and lest we forget Bill Clintons imbroglio with an intern), isnt about hypocrisy or crassness or cavalier apologies. Its about power.
But turn on the TV and youll hear that no one really cares anymore because its only sex.
If ever two words were mismatched.
There is never, ever only sex, especially for women, who are, indeed, different than men. We can argue otherwise until all the little dissertations cry oui, oui, oui all the way home. But the fact that the double standard persists in the human psyche, not to mention nature, demonstrates this unfair truth. This is why we have laws to level the playing field.
Perhaps the next step in this evolutionary process is not to make women more like men to neutralize the double standard but to place more women in public office, the better to demonstrate the behaviors necessary to maintaining a civil society.
To reach Kathleen Parker, send email to email@example.com.