Three months after authorities found a little girl locked in a Kansas City closet, dehydrated and malnourished, unanswered questions still haunt family members, advocates and some lawmakers.
By LAURA BAUER
The Kansas City Star
How, for five years, did the girl known as LP basically disappear after the system had recognized her to be a child in danger? Did child welfare workers follow up after she and her little sister were reunited with their mother in March 2007?
A month later, LP stopped going to school. Did caseworkers know that?
And did they ever, in the next five years, when she was kept inside her mothers apartment and often locked in a closet, visit that home again?
The people who have that information and under state law could provide it have refused to answer any questions. For three months, officials with the Missouri Department of Social Services have remained silent, declining even to say they have knowledge of LPs case.
First, the agency spokeswoman said state law prohibited the department from saying anything. Then she said officials wouldnt release information because of the ongoing court case against Jacole Prince, LPs mom.
Once the criminal justice matter is resolved, the Department will be in a position to reevaluate your request, DSS spokeswoman Rebecca Woelfel said last week in an email to The Star. It is also important to note that the Departments deference to the criminal justice process at this time is consistent with the local prosecutors wishes regarding your request.
Advocates and some state lawmakers say it is crucial to know what went wrong in this case so another child doesnt fall through the same cracks LP did. They insist that a system set up to protect the states most vulnerable children must be held accountable when something goes wrong.
One state senator has requested information about LPs case and so far has been denied. Though he has received information in the past from the Office of Child Advocate on other child welfare cases, the office told him that in LPs case he couldnt have anything.
I want to know how we got to this point, said Sen. Dan Brown, a Rolla Republican. Did the Department of Social Services follow up? Were there more hotline calls? The basic questions are what I want to know.
A new joint committee on child abuse and neglect, made up of seven state senators and seven House members, will analyze state programs and systems designed to protect children. The goal of the committee, formed before LP was found, is to improve the child welfare system in Missouri.
LPs case is expected to come up in that committee during the next session, which begins in January.
Sen. Jolie Justus, a Kansas City Democrat who is on that committee, is concerned that a number of high-profile child abuse and neglect cases could be a sign of a broken system. And in LPs case, more must be known.
Someone along the line failed this little girl, and I want to know who it is, Justus said. I want the facts so it wont happen again.
A need for sunshine
LP came to the attention of the states child welfare system in February 2006. Thats when, according to Family Court records, Jacole Prince admitted that she intentionally withheld food from LP so the girl wouldnt go to the bathroom too often. The state took custody of LP and a younger sister.
About 13 months later, after Prince reportedly had worked through a checklist of requirements set by the state, she got her two daughters back.
But after a month, LP stopped going to school and disappeared from sight. Neighbors of Prince have said they didnt even know LP lived in the apartment, although they often saw Prince with her two younger daughters, who were well kept and had nice clothes and toys.
Five years passed.
On June 22, authorities following up on a hotline call found LP locked in a dark and tiny closet amid her own urine and feces. At 10 years old, she weighed 32 pounds. Authorities believe she had been kept hidden inside her moms Kansas City apartment.
Her mother reportedly kept a bowl and a bottle behind a couch, where the girl would sometimes eat. LP told police that some days she went without food and was made to sleep in the closet, where she could be locked for days at a time.
She told the officers she didnt want to go home again.
Prince, 29, has been charged with three felony counts of child abuse, child endangerment and assault in the first degree. She has pleaded not guilty and sits in jail awaiting trial.
According to state law, when theres a child fatality, or near-fatality, the director of the Missouri Department of Social Services may release information about the case, including whether department workers made follow-up visits and for how long the visits continued. The law leaves the decision to release such information to the directors sole discretion.
In the weeks after a DSS caseworker and police followed up on a hotline call and found LP, an agency spokeswoman said state law prohibited them from even acknowledging they had a case.
State law prohibits release of information specific to a case or individual, so we could not confirm nor deny involvement in the case, Woelfel, the DSS spokeswoman, said in late June.
When reminded by The Star that state law says information may be released when a child was near death, the spokeswoman sent an email in July stating: This matter is now in the hands of the criminal justice system. We will reserve any further comments until the conclusion of that process.
When pressed last week, Woelfel indicated that the local prosecutor didnt want the information released.
Jackson County Prosecutor Jean Peters Baker said her office subpoenaed LPs DSS records shortly after the girl was found in June. Three months later, her office has yet to receive them, she said, but I know theyre working on it.
On Wednesday, the governors office called to ask her opinion on whether information should be released to the media, she said.
I told them I felt this would not be conducive to the criminal case, she said. I dont have the records myself. I would like to see whats in them first.
In other child abuse and neglect proceedings, DSS has released information before a criminal case goes to trial.
In late 2010, after prosecutors in southwest Missouri charged a mother with killing her child, the Springfield News-Leader requested the DSS case file. According to an April 2011 story, the newspaper received more than 300 pages that detailed the agencys involvement in the case. The mother, Tatianna Light, has not yet gone to trial.
A decade ago, after Springfield toddler Dominic James died from injuries suffered in foster care, the News-Leader sued to obtain his DSS file. The county prosecutor at the time expressed concerns early on that the state hadnt done enough to protect James.
James death in August 2002 sparked an overhaul of Missouris child welfare system. Legislators eventually passed the Dominic James Memorial Foster Care Reform Act, which allowed for some Family Court records to be open. That law is what permitted information on LP, and her involvement with DSS five years ago, to be released through family court.
One of the major goals of the legislation was to make the system more open to create more accountability, said former House member Mark Wright, a Springfield Republican who was a sponsor of the legislation.
Theres a saying, Sunshine is the best disinfectant, said Wright. The more transparency in government, the better the governments response to citizens its supposed to serve.
Neither DSS nor Gov. Jay Nixons office has addressed why in some recent cases in which a child has died, the agency has released records and information before the criminal case was resolved.
Sam Murphey, a spokesman with Nixons office, was asked whether DSS did an internal investigation after LP was found to determine whether all agency policies and procedures were followed.
The governors office has no comment at this point, he said Friday.
In the James case, Wright and others fought to hold the state accountable. He said he had hoped after the lessons learned a decade ago that state leaders would be more open now.
At the end of the day, our government officials need to do the legal and ethical thing, and thats to release information, said Wright, who left office because of term limits in January 2007. If they are hiding things, not giving out information, theres likely something they are trying to cover up.
Balancing privacy, transparency
The foundation of the child welfare system is privacy. Children in the system have a right to know that they and their information are protected.
When the courts entrust the legal custody of these children to the Department of Social Services, the Departments paramount responsibility is to promote and protect the safety and best interests of these vulnerable children, wrote Scotty L. Allen, chief counsel representing DSS, in a response to The Stars request for information in LPs case.
Indeed, when a child is taken into custody, the state doesnt say where that child is or who is providing care. Though police often say the child is in state custody, agency officials often dont even confirm that.
Rules on the release of information are spelled out in state law.
To protect the rights of the family and the child named in the report as a victim, the childrens division shall establish guidelines which will ensure that any disclosure of information concerning the abuse and neglect involving that child is made only to persons or agencies that have a right to such information, the law reads.
Families and advocates understand that.
But in cases where a tragedy occurs, advocates say its important to investigate whether there was a mistake or misstep, so that the system can be improved for the next child.
I think privacy of victims is an important consideration, said Emily van Schenkhof, deputy director of the nonprofit Missouri KidsFirst, a statewide child welfare advocacy agency. But we have to weigh that with public interest of what happened so more children arent hurt.
And while DSS has shared information and released records after a child dies, many wonder why the agency typically does not release records when a child is found near death, as Missouri law allows.
Does a child have to die before the system is fixed? van Schenkhof said.
In late July, during a Family Court hearing regarding the parental rights of Prince and Marcus Benson, who is the father of Princes two younger daughters, the guardian ad litems office asked the judge to close the hearings and court records to the public. Princes attorney said LPs mom would like them to be confidential as well. The attorney for the juvenile officer opposed the move, saying the hearings and records should remain open.
The judge closed the Family Court proceedings. Jermak Prince, Jacoles brother and LPs uncle, and another family member and friend had to leave the courtroom.
Jermak Prince said he didnt understand why the proceedings and filings couldnt remain open. He has his own questions, including why the state didnt evaluate his sister for a mental illness.
The only person they are protecting now is themselves, Jermak said on that July day. Shes my sister and I dont know what the hell is going on.
LPs case is also unusual in that so much of her story and all the allegations of how she was forced to live are already known. Kansas City area residents and people across the country have been so touched by her story that hundreds sent her cards and presents for her 11th birthday Aug. 1.
Residents who live in the Theron B. Watkins Homes complex, who say they didnt know LP was hidden inside apartment No. 11 for years, threw a birthday party in her honor. They wanted her to know that she matters and people care.
Many continue to send donations in her name to the Local Investment Commission. Already, more than $6,500 has been collected for the little girl.
Now, advocates say, the goal must be to examine how or whether she fell through any cracks in the state system.
Victims always say they want other children to not have to go through what they went through, van Schenkhof said. Most victims want to contribute to the greater good. That helps them heal.
To reach Laura Bauer, call 816-234-4944 or send email to email@example.com.