Posted on Wed, Dec. 23, 2009 11:12 PM
Buzz Up
Share
Email
Print
Email Story
closeTanning salons do a slow burn over a tax to pay for health care reform
More News
Pretty woman walking down the street ... It looks like you’re getting burned.
As the Senate completes its last vote today on an $871 billion health care bill, one of the revenue sources tucked in it stands out like a South Dakota farmer on Miami Beach.
A 10 percent tax on tanning bed use.
“I think it’s kind of sexist, I really do,” said Jodi King, 44, a frequent tanner at the Tan Spot in Lee’s Summit.
Others say it’s sort of a “sin” tax to promote safety.
“They chose us because we can’t fight back. We’re too little,” said Howard Hogan, owner of Sun Resorts Tanning Salons in Topeka and Lawrence.
The tanning lobby, of course, pales in comparison to the clout of cosmetic surgeons, who at one point feared a 5 percent tax on elective cosmetic surgery, a measure dubbed the “Botax.”
After a massive push by plastic surgeons and the American Medical Association, that idea was sliced away and the tax on tans was grafted on.
Eric Swanson of the Swanson Center for Cosmetic & Laser Surgery sees taxing either tanning or cosmetic surgery as the same — a gender issue and “an unfair tax on working women.”
Women make up almost all of tanning bed clients (85 percent) and cosmetic surgery patients (93 percent).
Doctors performed more than 10 million cosmetic procedures in 2008.
The top procedures: 2.5 million Botox injections; 1.3 million hyaluronic acid anti-wrinkle or “face lift” injections; 600,000 chemical peels; 356,000 breast augmentations; 195,000 liposuctions; 190,000 eyelid surgeries; 150,00 nose jobs.
The tanning industry estimates that 30 million people absorb their rays a year.
“In either case, they seem to be penalizing that demographic group,” said Swanson, the Leawood cosmetic surgeon. “To women, appearance is important … What’s wrong with that? Generally, my patients might be in their 30s or 40s. They’ve got kids, and what they’re paying is not an easy expense.”
Others note a difference between cosmetic surgery and tanning: Much of cosmetic surgery is helpful, while tanning is linked to skin cancer.
“We’re all going to die eventually anyway,” said King, who’s convinced that moderate tanning is safe. “I just won’t be as pale as everyone else.”
Donna Commins, 60, of Lenexa, used to enjoy tanning and concedes to have had some procedures —“enough that people think I’m in my 40s.”
“It’s discrimination,” she said. “In the world today, especially in the working world, women need to look their best. Even we middle-class ladies want to feel good and look good.”
The average tanning session costs between $6 and $10 with monthly rates ranging between $30 and $40.
The Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that a 10 percent tax on the $5 billion tanning industry could raise $2.7 billion over the next 10 years.
Although some think the tax could hurt the tanning business, Julie Walkins, owner of the Tan Spot, disagreed.
“In my experience, people who are going to tan are going to tan anyway, even if there is a nominal price increase,” she said.
“Ours is a women’s industry,” agreed John Overstreet, executive director of the Indoor Tanning Association: “The operators are women, the owners are women and most of the tanning customers are women — typically working women or college kids.”
The tax on tans, retorted Chicago physician Edward Lack, a past president of the American Academy of Cosmetic Surgery, has more to do with safety than sexism.
“The World Health Organization earlier this year declared tanning beds to be a direct, not an indirect, a direct indicator of malignant melanoma and other forms of skin cancer,” he said.
About 69,000 new cases of melanoma are diagnosed each year. The American Cancer Society estimates that the lifetime risk of developing melanoma is 2 percent for whites and 1 percent for African-Americans and Hispanics.
One recent review of international studies determined that those who used tanning beds increased their risk for developing melanoma by about 15 percent.
“I worked at a tanning salon in high school and I’ve tanned at salons for years,” said Kirsten Kwon, a student at the University of Kansas said in an e-mail. “I don’t want to pay more than I already pay, because tanning is already expensive, but I can understand” how the Senate saw another opportunity to profit.
Cosmetic surgeon Lack agreed: “I would call it a sin tax, just the way alcohol is taxed or cigarettes are taxed.”
Not sexist at all.
But if the Senate had decided to keep the tax of cosmetic surgery?
“That was a male-dominated legislature passing an anti-feminist tax,” Lack said.
To reach Eric Adler, call 816-234-4431 or send e-mail to eadler@kcstar.com. To reach Rick Montgomery, call 816-234-4410 or send e-mail to rmontgomery@kcstar.com.
Posted on Wed, Dec. 23, 2009 11:12 PM
@Nyx.CommentBody@