- HOME
- NEWS
- SPORTS
- BUSINESS
- FYI/LIVING
- ENTERTAINMENT
- OPINION
- JOBS
- CARS
- REAL ESTATE
- RENTALS
- CLASSIFIEDS
- SHOPPING
- EXTRAS
'); } -->
The news barely caused a ripple, not even a curl of a defiant lip from the Missouri football coaching staff this week during their annual summer camp at William Jewell College.
Phil Steele, the author of Phil Steele’s College Football Preview, predicted two-time North champion Missouri to finish fifth in the Big 12 North — ahead of only Iowa State and behind Kansas State and Colorado.
“That’s one man’s opinion,” said MU offensive coordinator David Yost, adding, “What’s his name?”
MU defensive coordinator Dave Steckel took no apparent umbrage.
“I don’t predict football games,” Steckel said. “God bless Phil.”
Head coach Gary Pinkel seemed not to break stride, even in acknowledging the obvious.
In some quarters there remains doubt that Missouri — despite the success of the last few seasons — is a year-in, year-out force in the Big 12 North.
Sure, the Tigers sent tight end Chase Coffman, receivers Jeremy Maclin and Tommy Saunders, defensive lineman Ziggy Hood and William Moore to NFL camps. Possibly more — like quarterback Chase Daniel and kicker Jeff Wolfert — will wind up there.
But who will replace those college standouts? And will the likes of quarterback Blaine Gabbert, tight end Andrew Jones and linebacker Sean Weatherspoon measure up?
It is a question that seemingly still is being asked about some teams — like Missouri — while not so much about others, including a Nebraska team that may have lost every bit as much as Missouri from a team that was crushed 52-17 by the Tigers last year.
“There are people out there that still, apparently, they kind of view us as a program where consistency of winning at a high level is a question mark,” Pinkel said. “Obviously, there’s a lack of respect.”
Part of the quandary of evaluating Missouri’s upcoming prospects goes beyond the amount of talent lost from last season’s 10-4 squad, and the previous year’s 12-2 Cotton Bowl champion team.
Yost and Steckel are making their debuts as coordinators. Are these two veteran assistants up to the job of showing the way for so many new players?
Will Missouri be the same mad-scientist offense without Dave Christensen?
“It changes,” Yost said. “But more of the change will happen because of personnel. What’s the best for our quarterback (projected starter Gabbert)? What do the other players do best?
“The things we ask Andrew Jones to do will not be designed off what Chase Coffman did.”
Missouri will still pass, of course. But the Tigers will likely run more, and stay with the run longer than in the past.
“You use what you’ve got and you put the ball in your playmakers’ hands,” Yost said. “(Tailbacks) Derrick Washington and De’Vion Moore, the guys that have earned and shown the right, they get the touches. The other guys are going to have to earn the right.”
Missouri will run some plays — most on the goal line — with its quarterback lined up under center, again because of current personnel.
“Blaine Gabbert, Jimmy Costello, Blaine Dalton, those guys have all played under center,” Yost said.
The change, at least in perception, could be more obvious on defense.
In Steckel instead of the departed Matt Eberflus, Missouri’s defensive mentality may seem more that of an attacking linebacker than a retreating safety.
In spring football, several veteran players noted a harder, no-nonsense persona out of Steckel. A sort of do-the-job-or-he’ll-get-someone-who-will.
Steckel admits that is the demand he makes of himself.
“I guess that just trickles down to the kids,” Steckel said.
The collapse of the Missouri defense in a 40-37 Border War loss to Kansas at Arrowhead Stadium opened a wound that still appears to be raw. However, Steckel noted that Missouri wound up third in the Big 12 in scoring defense.
“We weren’t a bad defense,” Steckel said. “But I guess perception is reality.”
There’s no getting around the notion that the perception is that Missouri has slipped, and perhaps badly.
“As a team, this will be the most athletic team we’ve had,” Pinkel predicted. “Whenever there is a transition at quarterback, there are always big question marks.
“Someone said to me the other day, ‘Bet you’re worried and concerned going into next year.’
“I’m always concerned. You know that. But I don’t sit around worrying about stuff.”
To reach Mike DeArmond, send e-mail to mdearmond@kcstar.com
@Nyx.CommentBody@